header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

My kingdom for a consultation?

nlj_7673_dobson

Nicholas Dobson digs up the reinterment of Richard III

Shakespeare’s Richard III is dark, duplicitous and dangerous. For instance (among many villainies) he arranges the murder of his nephews aka “those bastards in the Tower” who are “Foes to my rest, and my sweet sleep’s disturbers”. But the Richard III Society (the society) believes that “many features of the traditional accounts of the character and career of Richard III are neither supported by sufficient evidence nor reasonably tenable”. And “wonderful play” though it is, Richard III is “not history” and “does not represent fact”.

Whatever the reality, Richard has given public lawyers great posthumous service by clarifying the nature and scope of some key areas of public law. This followed the discovery in 2012 of his mortal remains beneath a Leicester City Council car park. For in R (Plantagenet Alliance) v. Secretary of State for Justice and others [2014] EWHC 1662 (Admin), [2015] 3 All ER 261, the Divisional Court (Hallett LJ VP and Ouseley and Haddon Cave JJ) rejected various challenge grounds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll