header-logo header-logo

24 January 2008 / Paul Nicholls
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Company , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

My word is my bond

Bear Stearns represents a costly lesson in contractual principles, says Paul Nicholls

In Bear Stearns Bank plc v Forum Global Equity Ltd [2007] EWHC 1576 (Comm), [2007] All ER (D) 103 (Jul), Mr Justice Andrew Smith gave a judgment which reaffirmed the basic legal and City principle that “my word is my bond”. The judge also demonstrated the extent to which the law seeks to uphold commercial transactions and is wary of technical attempts by parties to avoid their contracts.

 

The case concerned loan notes in respect of the distressed debt of an entity in the Parmalat group (the Italian group of companies that collapsed in 2003). Forum Global acquired the notes and applied to be admitted to the list of Parmalat creditors in the administration. The value of the notes lay in the dividend to be paid on the claims in the insolvency.

 

NEGOTIATIONS

Forum Global commenced negotiations with Bear Stearns for the sale of the notes. There were several discussions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll