header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Naming and shaming complaints plan attacked

In Brief

The Legal Complaints Service’s proposals to publish solicitor complaints records has drawn bitter criticism from the Law Society. In its response to the LCS consultation— Exploring the Publication of Solicitors Complaints Records—the society says the move will mislead clients and unfairly penalise solicitors who give good client care. Society chief executive Des Hudson claims the LCS’s preferred option is a mistake that will rebound to the disadvantage of the public.

He says: “The society agrees it is important that clients should have meaningful information to help them choose a solicitor who is right for their legal problem and situation. But we do not believe the LCS’s proposals are likely to achieve this. Indeed, they may well mislead clients away from competent solicitors.” Hudson says the society favours helping solicitors to deal well with clients and plans to devote “significant resources” to enhance client service across the profession.

“We are giving solicitors real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training. This is more likely to achieve good service to clients than what looks like a crude exercise in naming and shaming,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll