header-logo header-logo

Naming and shaming complaints plan attacked

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

In Brief

The Legal Complaints Service’s proposals to publish solicitor complaints records has drawn bitter criticism from the Law Society. In its response to the LCS consultation— Exploring the Publication of Solicitors Complaints Records—the society says the move will mislead clients and unfairly penalise solicitors who give good client care. Society chief executive Des Hudson claims the LCS’s preferred option is a mistake that will rebound to the disadvantage of the public.

He says: “The society agrees it is important that clients should have meaningful information to help them choose a solicitor who is right for their legal problem and situation. But we do not believe the LCS’s proposals are likely to achieve this. Indeed, they may well mislead clients away from competent solicitors.” says the society favours helping solicitors to deal well with clients and plans to devote “significant resources” to enhance client service across the profession.

“We are giving solicitors real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training. This is more likely to achieve good service to clients than what looks like a crude exercise in naming and shaming,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll