header-logo header-logo

Naming and shaming complaints plan attacked

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

In Brief

The Legal Complaints Service’s proposals to publish solicitor complaints records has drawn bitter criticism from the Law Society. In its response to the LCS consultation— Exploring the Publication of Solicitors Complaints Records—the society says the move will mislead clients and unfairly penalise solicitors who give good client care. Society chief executive Des Hudson claims the LCS’s preferred option is a mistake that will rebound to the disadvantage of the public.

He says: “The society agrees it is important that clients should have meaningful information to help them choose a solicitor who is right for their legal problem and situation. But we do not believe the LCS’s proposals are likely to achieve this. Indeed, they may well mislead clients away from competent solicitors.” says the society favours helping solicitors to deal well with clients and plans to devote “significant resources” to enhance client service across the profession.

“We are giving solicitors real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training. This is more likely to achieve good service to clients than what looks like a crude exercise in naming and shaming,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll