header-logo header-logo

Naming and shaming complaints plan attacked

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

In Brief

The Legal Complaints Service’s proposals to publish solicitor complaints records has drawn bitter criticism from the Law Society. In its response to the LCS consultation— Exploring the Publication of Solicitors Complaints Records—the society says the move will mislead clients and unfairly penalise solicitors who give good client care. Society chief executive Des Hudson claims the LCS’s preferred option is a mistake that will rebound to the disadvantage of the public.

He says: “The society agrees it is important that clients should have meaningful information to help them choose a solicitor who is right for their legal problem and situation. But we do not believe the LCS’s proposals are likely to achieve this. Indeed, they may well mislead clients away from competent solicitors.” Hudson says the society favours helping solicitors to deal well with clients and plans to devote “significant resources” to enhance client service across the profession.

“We are giving solicitors real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training. This is more likely to achieve good service to clients than what looks like a crude exercise in naming and shaming,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll