header-logo header-logo

National Health Service

06 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of the Enfield London Borough Council) v Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group and others [2013] EWHC 3496 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 279 (Nov)

In September 2013, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and an NHS Trust decided to implement prior decisions, endorsed by the secretary of state for health to close the accident and emergency department of a hospital (the A&E) with effect from December 2013. The claimant local authority applied for judicial review, arguing among other things that the CCGs had created a substantive expectation, either as to the actual primary care services to be in place before closure or as to an identifiable level of such services, from which it would be an abuse of power for the CCGs to depart. 

In refusing permission to apply for judicial review, the court held that it was settled law that the initial burden lay on an applicant to prove the legitimacy of his expectation. That meant that, in a claim based on a promise, the claimant had to prove the promise, and that it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll