header-logo header-logo

National Savings Bank (Amendment) (No 2) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/2288)

20 September 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amend the National Savings Bank Regulations 1972, SI 1972/764 and the National Savings Bank (Investment Deposits) (Limits) Order 1977, SI 1977/1210 to modernise the National Savings and Investments Investment Account and make it a more cost effective account to administer.

Commencement date

Partly on 28 November 2011; fully on 21 May 2012


Legislation Affected
SI 1972/764, SI 1977/1210 amended

 

Summary

Require the Director of Savings to cease issuing and updating passbooks. Instead, customers will be sent a transaction record by post after each deposit or withdrawal is made. Customers will be provided with an annual statement and will also be able to obtain a statement at any time upon request.

Current transaction options are narrowed. The age at which children may open and manage an Investment Account is increased to sixteen. A child who holds an Investment Account and is already entitled to manage it when the amendments take effect on 21 May 2012 will be allowed to continue to do so.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll