header-logo header-logo

NatWest case means no bank ‘too big’

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Financial services litigation , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
Bank to face money laundering accusations in court

Money laundering action launched against NatWest will send ‘shockwaves’ through the financial sector, a senior criminal lawyer has said.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced this week it has begun criminal proceedings against National Westminster Bank Plc (NatWest) in respect of offences under the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (MLR).

It is the FCA’s first criminal prosecution under the MLR and the first under the regulations to be brought against a bank.

The allegations relate to failings to determine, conduct and demonstrate due diligence and ongoing monitoring of relationships with customers to prevent money laundering between 11 November 2011 and 19 October 2016.

The FCA alleges about £365m was paid into a UK incorporated customer’s accounts, of which about £264m was in cash. Natwest is scheduled to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 14 April. No individuals are being charged under the proceedings.

Claire Cross, a partner at Corker Binning specialising in white collar fraud, said: ‘Despite Mark Steward, the FCA’s head of enforcement, stating back in 2018 that the regulator had commenced a small number of investigations to ascertain whether there had been any misconduct in the industry that might justify a prosecution under the MLR, up until today the general consensus was that a criminal case would be unlikely to be forth coming. 

‘This was partly due to the fact that the FCA had shut the majority of its criminal based investigations in this area and partly due to the amount of time that had passed since the original announcement.’

Cross said the proceedings set ‘an important precedent―no-one is too big to escape the FCA’s criminal net.

‘Mark Steward claimed in 2019 that he suspected that criminal cases rather than civil or regulatory action would be “exceptional” but he was also keen that the prosecution powers should not be a “white elephant”.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll