header-logo header-logo

Navigating corporate fraud—remedies in England & India

196789
Cooke Young & Keidan team up with lawyers from Aikyam Law Offices in India to compare approaches to company wrongdoing
  • Both England & Wales and India provide remedies for corporate fraud, including through derivative actions, where shareholders take action on behalf of the company against wrongdoings by those in control of the company.
  • In England & Wales statutory derivative actions are governed by the Companies Act 2006, whereby court permission is required and the law focuses on protecting the company, offering remedies like damages, injunctions, and potential criminal charges for directors.
  • In India, the Companies Act, 2013 includes both civil and criminal penalties for fraud, allowing actions through the NCLT with remedies like personal liability, disgorgement, and class actions for shareholder protection.

Corporate fraud is becoming increasingly common particularly in times of economic downturn or geopolitical upheaval, something large swathes of the world has experienced in the last four years (or more).

In the UK, according

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll