header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 August 2025 / Dan Moore , Richard Ellis , Jack Sears
Issue: 8127 / Categories: Features , Financial services litigation , Insolvency , Regulatory , Compliance
printer mail-detail

Navigating financial services regulation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
226818
Dan Moore, Richard Ellis & Jack Sears provide a guide for insolvency practitioners
  • This article guides insolvency practitioners (IPs) through the UK financial services regulatory framework.
  • It focuses on IPs’ interaction with the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, the general prohibition, and various related statutory instruments.
  • It also addresses the potential risks to IPs of non-compliance, and the scope and boundaries of the exclusions available to them. 

At the heart of the UK’s financial services regulatory environment is the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (RAO 2001). These two pieces of legislation govern the carrying on of various activities (known as ‘regulated activities’) by companies and individuals in the UK.

Another component of this regulatory framework is the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (FPO 2005), which sets out some of the principal rules around making financial promotions.

In summary, s 21, FSMA 2000 and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll