header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021 / Helen Armstrong , William Rowell
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Navigating Pt 36: challenges & pitfalls

48176
Part 36 settlement offers: Helen Armstrong & William Rowell outline how to avoid the pitfalls
  • Part 36 regime: an influential settlement weapon.
  • Recent judgments: outlining the highly complex area for parties and their advisers.

The Pt 36 regime is arguably one of the most influential weapons in the Civil Procedure Rules’ (CPR) arsenal for encouraging settlement. It provides a statutory code of prescribed costs, damages and interest enhancements that essentially penalise parties who fail to accept a reasonable settlement offer.

The rules relating to Pt 36 offers are, however, very complex. There are various formal requirements for making an offer. Parties may inadvertently (and unknowingly) fail to make a compliant Pt 36 offer and cannot benefit from the enhanced costs consequences they had envisaged. Even where an offer is compliant, if it would be ‘unjust’ to award the prescribed benefits, the court can disapply them. The whole regime becomes a procedural minefield.

A series of recent judgments illustrates how difficult this area can be for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll