header-logo header-logo

Negligence

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Co-Operative Group (CSW) Ltd v Pritchard [2011] EWCA Civ 329, [2011] All ER (D) 312 (Mar)

The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 would not allow damages to be reduced by virtue of a party’s alleged contributory negligence in cases where claims were based on the tort of assault and battery. 

Insofar as there were cases since the Act that suggested that it could be used to reduce damages awarded for the torts of assault or battery in a case where it was found that the claimant was “contributorily negligent” they were unsatisfactory and could not stand with statements of principle.

That conclusion was in keeping with the purpose of the Act, as set out in s 1(1), which was to relieve claimants whose actions would previously have failed, not to reduce the damages which would have previously have been awarded to claimants.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll