header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Neuberger calls for Brexit clarity

Judges need more clarity about how to apply post-Brexit decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), Lord Neuberger has said.

After Brexit, historic judgments of the ECJ will retain the same binding status in UK courts, under the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Repeal Bill). However, the extent to which courts must take new judgments into account is not clear.

In an interview with the BBC this week, Lord Neuberger, who retires next month from the role of President of the Supreme Court, said judges should not be blamed for any misinterpretation if the position is not made clear.

Lord Neuberger said all judges ‘would hope and expect Parliament to spell out how the judges would approach that sort of issue after Brexit, and to spell it out in a statute.

Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll