header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Neuberger calls for Brexit clarity

Judges need more clarity about how to apply post-Brexit decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), Lord Neuberger has said.

After Brexit, historic judgments of the ECJ will retain the same binding status in UK courts, under the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Repeal Bill). However, the extent to which courts must take new judgments into account is not clear.

In an interview with the BBC this week, Lord Neuberger, who retires next month from the role of President of the Supreme Court, said judges should not be blamed for any misinterpretation if the position is not made clear.

Lord Neuberger said all judges ‘would hope and expect Parliament to spell out how the judges would approach that sort of issue after Brexit, and to spell it out in a statute.

Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll