header-logo header-logo

Neurotechnology & the law: intellectual property

242553

Neurotechnology is advancing at breakneck speed—but can existing patent law keep up? Larissa Bifano, Rebecca Lawrence & Harry Lambert examine the IP challenges facing innovators in the UK & US

  • Neurotechnology innovation increasingly depends on AI-driven data processing, raising significant challenges under patent law exclusions for software, mathematical methods, and diagnostic or surgical techniques.
  • UK and US patent regimes take different approaches to subject-matter eligibility, inventorship, and technical effect, requiring carefully tailored patent strategies for transatlantic protection.

Neurotechnology continues to advance with increasing sophistication, striving for less invasive interfaces and more precise interaction with the nervous system. However, the efficacy of these devices increasingly depends on how they handle the high-dimensional, noisy data they record.

Innovators are turning to rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) to decode these signals and enable closed-loop control. This reliance on software and algorithms brings the field into direct collision with patent regimes in the UK and US, which maintain strict exclusions for computer programs and mathematical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll