header-logo header-logo

10 February 2012 / Tony Marks , Jonathan Tecks
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Features , Family , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

A new arrival

Tony Marks & Jonathan Tecks introduce a new family member

Over three years ago a group of family lawyers came together at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) to explore the possibility of developing an alternative method of dispute resolution for financial or property disputes with a family background.

Although some progress had been made in recent years in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) by the use of mediation, early neutral evaluation, collaborative law etc, arguably the best potential alternative to court proceedings (where a “determination” rather than a negotiated or mediated settlement is required)—namely arbitration—had so far not been developed in England and Wales. Schemes already exist in Australia and, most recently, in Scotland (following the passing of the new Arbitration Act in Scotland). The meeting at CIArb was the first step in creating a bespoke family arbitration scheme for England and Wales.

The scheme

The scheme has now been set up and is the result of collaboration between Resolution, the Family Law Bar Association (FLBA), CIArb and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll