header-logo header-logo

22 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New balance of power

SRA report City firms are under increased pressure from clients

City law firms are under acute pressure from clients over pricing and terms of engagement, new research has shown.

The balance of power between client and lawyer has shifted, according to an independent study commissioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Independence, risk and representation: An Empirical Exploration of the Management of Client Relationships by Large Law Firms. However, firms that resist terms of engagement that they find unacceptable will still find work.

During interviews with senior corporate lawyers from 20 of the largest firms, undertaken by the University of Birmingham and Claire Legal Ltd, about three-quarters of interviewees outlined scenarios where they were forced to accept onerous terms of engagement with little room for discussion on fees, conflict of interest requirements and IT security.

Clients are restricting via contract who a firm can or cannot work for, raising access to representation issues.

The report states: “Of most concern are claims from some lawyers that these contractual provisions might be used strategically by some clients to deny claimants representation from a tier of firms. It was suggested to us by a minority of our interviewees that law firms may be appointed to those panels, and made to sign ‘no sue’ clauses, where the client has little or no intention of giving that firm work.” While the report’s authors suggest that further research is needed to substantiate these claims, they describe them as “alarming”.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director for policy, says the increased pressure makes it “all the more important that the professional principles of independence and ethical practices remain at the heart of solicitors’ decision-making”.

Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll