header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007 / Lea Brocklebank
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

A new contract?

Lea Brocklebank considers how Law Commission proposals could affect insurance contract law

T he joint consultation paper issued by the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission on insurance contract law invited responses by 16 November 2007. The consultation paper, Contract Law: Misrepresentation, Non-disclosure and Breach of Warranty by the Insured, proposes different reforms for consumer insurance and business insurance with a default regime for business insurance contracts based on accepted good practice which would apply in the absence of an agreement to the contrary.

For consumers, the proposals include: replacing the insured’s duty to disclose information with a duty to answer questions honestly and reasonably; introducing a test for materiality based on the “reasonable insured” rather than the “prudent insurer”; the introduction of new remedies that would be proportionate to the situation; and a change in the remedies for innocent and negligent representation.

In relation to the consumer’s duty to volunteer information to the insurer about anything that would influence a prudent underwriter’s assessment of the risk, the proposals replace this so that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll