header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018
Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

New court keeps England competitive

Business & Property Courts an innovation in dispute resolution, says Lord Chief Justice

The legal profession needs to drop its use of ‘unintelligible and incomprehensible names and titles’ in order to provide a world-class service in the face of increasing competition from abroad, a senior judge has said.

Launching the Business and Property Courts in Bristol this week along with the Lord Chief Justice and other dignitaries, Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court, emphasised the importance of judges and lawyers in demonstrating the high quality of English law and courts as the UK prepares for Brexit.

‘We need to reach out to the users of these courts and to national and international business generally, so as to ensure that they understand what we are offering in terms of business and commercial litigation here in England and Wales,’ Sir Geoffrey said.

‘Lawyers have, I am afraid, always rather liked using words that nobody else can understand. We have tried, unsuccessfully, for more than 200 years to explain to the business community what “Chancery” means. Since that word is still very widely misunderstood, I took the view that it was time to quit trying.’ Consequently, ‘Mercantile’ judges had been renamed ‘Circuit Commercial judges’ and the ‘Mercantile Court’ had become the ‘Circuit Commercial Court’.

The Business and Property Courts launched in London in July 2017 and have since launched at regional centres in Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds and Cardiff. Launches in Newcastle and Liverpool will take place in the coming weeks.

Sir Geoffrey told the Bristol gathering that a ‘critical mass of judges’ would be created in each regional centre, so that ‘no case will ever to be too big to be tried in the regions’.

‘Our UK jurisdictions have for some years faced increasing competition from other jurisdictions in Europe and beyond,' he said. 

‘In the last year, business or commercial courts that operate in the English language have been started or are about to be started in Amsterdam, Brussels, Paris and Frankfurt. They would all very much like to attract the international work that we do in the B&PCs to use these new courts.’

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, said: ‘Barely a month goes by without a report of another jurisdiction establishing or considering whether to establish an English-speaking commercial court. And the question of venue becomes ever more competitive… The Business and Property Courts creation is our most recent innovation. It brings together judicial expertise in finance, business and markets, property, intellectual property, and technology and construction law. It offers an excellent forum for court-based dispute resolution.’

Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll