header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Henrietta Mason , Chris Williams
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

New departures…or not?

Henrietta Mason & Chris Williams report on two intriguing recent cases involving undue influence & excessive costs

  • The benefits of early investigation of evidence.
  • Removal and substitution of personal representative and associated costs.

It is rare to see a successful summary judgment application in an estate dispute. It is even more rare for a successful summary judgment application in an undue influence case. But this is what happened in the recent case of Moursi v Doherty [2019] EWHC 830 (Ch), [2019] All ER (D) 47 (Apr).

The facts

An application for summary judgment asks that judgment be given at an early stage in the litigation process without key stages of litigation being reached, for example disclosure, and without the opportunity for witnesses to be cross-examined at trial. A successful summary judgment application by (in this case) a claimant, requires that the claimant show that the defendant has no realistic prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.

Estate disputes tend to be heavily fact-based and it is difficult

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll