header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Henrietta Mason , Chris Williams
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

New departures…or not?

Henrietta Mason & Chris Williams report on two intriguing recent cases involving undue influence & excessive costs

  • The benefits of early investigation of evidence.
  • Removal and substitution of personal representative and associated costs.

It is rare to see a successful summary judgment application in an estate dispute. It is even more rare for a successful summary judgment application in an undue influence case. But this is what happened in the recent case of Moursi v Doherty [2019] EWHC 830 (Ch), [2019] All ER (D) 47 (Apr).

The facts

An application for summary judgment asks that judgment be given at an early stage in the litigation process without key stages of litigation being reached, for example disclosure, and without the opportunity for witnesses to be cross-examined at trial. A successful summary judgment application by (in this case) a claimant, requires that the claimant show that the defendant has no realistic prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.

Estate disputes tend to be heavily fact-based and it is difficult

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll