header-logo header-logo

New departures…or not?

08 August 2019 / Henrietta Mason , Chris Williams
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

Henrietta Mason & Chris Williams report on two intriguing recent cases involving undue influence & excessive costs

  • The benefits of early investigation of evidence.
  • Removal and substitution of personal representative and associated costs.

It is rare to see a successful summary judgment application in an estate dispute. It is even more rare for a successful summary judgment application in an undue influence case. But this is what happened in the recent case of Moursi v Doherty [2019] EWHC 830 (Ch), [2019] All ER (D) 47 (Apr).

The facts

An application for summary judgment asks that judgment be given at an early stage in the litigation process without key stages of litigation being reached, for example disclosure, and without the opportunity for witnesses to be cross-examined at trial. A successful summary judgment application by (in this case) a claimant, requires that the claimant show that the defendant has no realistic prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.

Estate disputes tend to be heavily fact-based and it is difficult

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll