header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Henrietta Mason , Chris Williams
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

New departures…or not?

Henrietta Mason & Chris Williams report on two intriguing recent cases involving undue influence & excessive costs

  • The benefits of early investigation of evidence.
  • Removal and substitution of personal representative and associated costs.

It is rare to see a successful summary judgment application in an estate dispute. It is even more rare for a successful summary judgment application in an undue influence case. But this is what happened in the recent case of Moursi v Doherty [2019] EWHC 830 (Ch), [2019] All ER (D) 47 (Apr).

The facts

An application for summary judgment asks that judgment be given at an early stage in the litigation process without key stages of litigation being reached, for example disclosure, and without the opportunity for witnesses to be cross-examined at trial. A successful summary judgment application by (in this case) a claimant, requires that the claimant show that the defendant has no realistic prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.

Estate disputes tend to be heavily fact-based and it is difficult

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll