header-logo header-logo

25 November 2011 / Kate Knox , David Savage
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

New developments

David Savage & Kate Knox provide an update on the latest construction contract changes

There has been a new payment regime that applies to all “construction contracts” entered into on or after 1 October 2011. The changes to the payment provisions set out in the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996) have been introduced by Pt 8 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 (LDEDCA 2009), following extensive consultation across the construction industry over recent years.

Changes to the payment procedure

In simple terms, construction contracts will need to provide for the following payment structure:

  • Payment due date.
  • Payment notice.
  • Payer’s “pay less” notice.
  • Final date for payment.

The new provisions require a payment notice and a pay less notice to be given, even if the sum due is
zero. Separate payment notices and pay less notices must be served.

The scheme for construction contracts will apply to non-compliant contracts (or to the deficient area of the contract). Consequently, the scheme has also been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll