header-logo header-logo

New device predicts personal injury outcomes

07 November 2014
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hodge, Jones & Allen (HJA) has engineered a device that can calculate the likely outcomes of personal injury cases.  

The 200-staff London firm asked Andrew Chesher, professor of economics and economic measurement at University College London, to examine 600 cases concluded over a 12-month period using statistical techniques to determine the factors contributing to success or failure and level of damages and costs. 

Prof Chesher’s analysis took into account the demographics of the claimant, the nature and cause of injury, the type of defendant, the quality of the defendant’s solicitors, the level of solicitor handling the case, the number and type of witnesses, the corroborating evidence available, the reporting of cases to authorities and hospitals, and the time between injury and instruction. 

The results of the analysis have been converted into Excel-based programmes able to predict the likelihood of cases being won.
Initial assessments of cases are critical to the success of personal injury practices because the Jackson reforms have required both sides of a dispute to provide up-front costs estimates. 

Prof Chesher says: “There are complex interactions between many of the variables we analysed and, as with many markets where human judgement is involved, there is always an element of unpredictability. 

“However, particularly with the model predicting the likelihood of a case being won or lost, we were able to produce robust models that will improve over time as further data is collected.” 

Interestingly, the analysis showed that the age and working status of the claimant is important in predicting outcomes, as well as the existence of some gender bias. The length of time between injury and instruction also has an impact. Witnesses and reliable evidence were not instrumental in predicting a win or loss but were important in obtaining higher damages. 

Patrick Allen, senior oartner of HJA, says the models will not replace the experience and judgment of the firm’s enquiry handling team but would give them “an additional aid”.

Matt Cuell, HJA’s personal injury team manager, says the modelling “challenged some of our prejudices about the cases we should be taking on”.

 

Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll