header-logo header-logo

A new direction?

01 April 2008 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Stephen Acton reports on changes to directors' duties

As will be familiar to all readers, directors owe duties to their companies. This has, since the early days of company law, been recognised by the courts as a necessary consequence of the creation of companies as artificial legal constructs, the consequent necessity for persons to manage them, and the potential for the separation in identity between owners of companies and those charged with directing their management. The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) has made statutory provision for these duties. What are the purposes of these provisions and what will be their effect?

 

Directors' Duties Prior to the Companies ACT 2006

Directors are sui generis, so far as English law is concerned, but the courts have fashioned and developed the duties which they owe to their companies by analogy with, and close reference to the duties owed by those whom they most closely resemble, in particular trustees and agents. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll