header-logo header-logo

A new direction?

01 April 2008 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Stephen Acton reports on changes to directors' duties

As will be familiar to all readers, directors owe duties to their companies. This has, since the early days of company law, been recognised by the courts as a necessary consequence of the creation of companies as artificial legal constructs, the consequent necessity for persons to manage them, and the potential for the separation in identity between owners of companies and those charged with directing their management. The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) has made statutory provision for these duties. What are the purposes of these provisions and what will be their effect?

 

Directors' Duties Prior to the Companies ACT 2006

Directors are sui generis, so far as English law is concerned, but the courts have fashioned and developed the duties which they owe to their companies by analogy with, and close reference to the duties owed by those whom they most closely resemble, in particular trustees and agents. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll