header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011 / Dr Tom Begbie , Professor Sue Prince
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

New directions

Dr Sue Prince & Dr Tom Begbie consider attempts to rethink social diversity in the legal profession

Can the changes in higher education funding help universities and law firms to work together to encourage more diverse entry to the legal profession?

Reforming higher education

The education white paper, Students at the Heart of the System (2011) lays down the government’s proposed reforms for higher education, following the introduction of a new costs regime, imposed through the raising of the university fees cap. A university education purports to provide graduates with an income which is 60% higher than those with no qualifications. From 2012, if a university wishes to be able to charge over £6,000 to the majority of its applicants, there are strict requirements on boosting the number of places for those from socially-disadvantaged backgrounds. The Browne Review (2010) specifically states that “Everyone who has the potential should have the opportunity to benefit from higher education” and recommends that universities should be evaluated on their ability to provide fair

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll