header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011 / Dr Tom Begbie , Professor Sue Prince
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

New directions

Dr Sue Prince & Dr Tom Begbie consider attempts to rethink social diversity in the legal profession

Can the changes in higher education funding help universities and law firms to work together to encourage more diverse entry to the legal profession?

Reforming higher education

The education white paper, Students at the Heart of the System (2011) lays down the government’s proposed reforms for higher education, following the introduction of a new costs regime, imposed through the raising of the university fees cap. A university education purports to provide graduates with an income which is 60% higher than those with no qualifications. From 2012, if a university wishes to be able to charge over £6,000 to the majority of its applicants, there are strict requirements on boosting the number of places for those from socially-disadvantaged backgrounds. The Browne Review (2010) specifically states that “Everyone who has the potential should have the opportunity to benefit from higher education” and recommends that universities should be evaluated on their ability to provide fair

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll