header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

A new era for contact?

Will a new contact regime tame recalcitrant parents? asks Simon Blain

After a lengthy wait, Pt 1 of the Children and Adoption Act 2006 (CAA 2006) will come into force on 8 December 2008. The legislation sets out new powers of the court to make contact activity directions and contact activity conditions, together with new provisions for the enforcement of contact orders.

Contact activity directions
A contact activity direction can be made whenever the court is considering whether to make a contact order, or to vary or discharge an existing order. Contact arrangements must be in dispute between the parties, and the court cannot make such a direction when making a final contact order.

A contact activity direction is defined as “a direction requiring an individual who is a party to the proceedings to take part in an activity that promotes contact with the child concerned”. Examples would include parenting or anger management classes. The child’s welfare is the paramount consideration for the court when deciding whether to make such a direction. No party

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll