header-logo header-logo

08 July 2010 / Alex Gask , Jamie Burton
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A new gateway?

Jamie Burton & Alex Gask consider how the gateway defence could make life easier for non-secure tenants

The ultimate impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 (and in particular Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights) on the rights of tenants who have limited security of tenure may not be known until nine Supreme Court judges hear the appeal in Pinnock v Manchester CC [2009] EWCA 852, [2009] All ER (D) 10 (Aug) later this month. However, in the five conjoined appeals in Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, [2010] All ER (D) 289 (Mar) the Court of Appeal has in the meantime tried to “provide some guidance as quickly as possible to the courts dealing with these cases”. In particular the court addressed two issues: what is the appropriate venue for hearing a defence based on Art 8; and what standard of review must the court apply when determining it? It also granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

BackgroundWhile they wait for a more permanent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll