header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New grading system

Legal executives are to be graded according to a new set of standards.

Under the Legal Services Act 2007, fellows of the Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX) can be partners in law firms. They can also apply for certain judicial posts, including that of deputy district judge in the magistrates’ courts.

Since 14 October 2009, legal executives who had not become Fellows are graded as: ILEX affiliates, where members hold at least one ILEX level 3 unit qualification, a relevant legal qualification at level 2, or at least three years’ experience in mainly fee earning work; ILEX associates, where they have completed their ILEX level 3 professional diploma in law and practice, or are graduates with qualifying law degrees; and ILEX graduate members, where they have completed the Ilex level 6 professional diploma, or have a Legal Practice Course or a Bar Vocational Course qualification.

ILEX president, Judith Nichols, says: “Once they have completed their first stage of ILEX academic training and become an associate, employers can charge fee-earning time as level D litigation assistant fee scale. Once they have passed their second stage of academic training and become a graduate member they can be charged out at level C litigation assistant fee scale, which is currently up to £222 an hour in London or £158 nationally.”
 

Issue: 7390 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll