header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New grading system

Legal executives are to be graded according to a new set of standards.

Under the Legal Services Act 2007, fellows of the Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX) can be partners in law firms. They can also apply for certain judicial posts, including that of deputy district judge in the magistrates’ courts.

Since 14 October 2009, legal executives who had not become Fellows are graded as: ILEX affiliates, where members hold at least one ILEX level 3 unit qualification, a relevant legal qualification at level 2, or at least three years’ experience in mainly fee earning work; ILEX associates, where they have completed their ILEX level 3 professional diploma in law and practice, or are graduates with qualifying law degrees; and ILEX graduate members, where they have completed the Ilex level 6 professional diploma, or have a Legal Practice Course or a Bar Vocational Course qualification.

ILEX president, Judith Nichols, says: “Once they have completed their first stage of ILEX academic training and become an associate, employers can charge fee-earning time as level D litigation assistant fee scale. Once they have passed their second stage of academic training and become a graduate member they can be charged out at level C litigation assistant fee scale, which is currently up to £222 an hour in London or £158 nationally.”
 

Issue: 7390 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll