header-logo header-logo

13 July 2018 / Toby Boncey , Stephanie Tozer
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A new line of attack?

nlj_7801_boncey

Stephanie Tozer & Toby Boncey provide a master class in litigation under the new Electronic Communications Code

  • Types of claim which may arise under the new code.
  • The power to impose an agreement on a landowner without his consent.

On 28 December 2017, a new Electronic Communications Code, which can be found in Schedule 1 of the Digital Economy Act 2017, came into force. In simple terms, its purpose was to make it easier for operators to acquire and retain rights to use land needed to enable them to provide comprehensive networks. The operators to whom the code applies are listed on the Ofcom website. Most of them run telephone networks and/or provide broadband internet access.

A number of types of claim may arise under the code. This article focuses on two of the most significant types of litigation under the code which are likely to arise in the near future:

  • litigation about apparatus which has been in situ since before 28 December 2017; and
  • new agreements: the power to impose
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll