header-logo header-logo

New TUPE now in force

04 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Leading employment lawyer sums up changes

Collective agreements on issues such as pay and conditions can now transfer to the incoming employer, under new TUPE laws.

The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on 31 January.

Leading employment lawyer, Dr John McMullen, partner, Wrigleys Solicitors, says: “Perhaps most controversial is the idea that a transferee may take the benefit of pre-transfer consultation over collective redundancies.  

“A transferee may elect to carry out consultation in respect of proposed redundancies prior to the transfer provided that the transferor agrees to it and the usual requirements about meaningful consultation are satisfied. It is perhaps dubious whether this complies with European law and the process is conditional on both employers agreeing. According to BIS, ‘it is unclear how many businesses will decide to use this measure’.”

McMullen says an “awkward” point in the 2006 Regulations regarding transfers involving a change of location or workplace has now been settled, meaning such changes could no longer trigger automatic unfair dismissal claims.

He added: “In some ways the Regulations are more important for what they do not do than what they do.  

“For example, apart from one small amendment the service provision change rules have been retained and the transferor’s obligation to give the transferee employee liability information has also been retained, and strengthened.  

“Of interest to employers will be the simplification of the rules relating to permitted variations of employment contracts and dismissals because of a transfer. Variations will no longer be invalid and dismissals only automatically unfair if the sole or principal reason for the variation or dismissal is the transfer.” 

McMullen says it will also now “be possible to renegotiate terms derived from collective agreements after one year and provided that employees are no worse off”.

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll