header-logo header-logo

04 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New TUPE now in force

Leading employment lawyer sums up changes

Collective agreements on issues such as pay and conditions can now transfer to the incoming employer, under new TUPE laws.

The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on 31 January.

Leading employment lawyer, Dr John McMullen, partner, Wrigleys Solicitors, says: “Perhaps most controversial is the idea that a transferee may take the benefit of pre-transfer consultation over collective redundancies.  

“A transferee may elect to carry out consultation in respect of proposed redundancies prior to the transfer provided that the transferor agrees to it and the usual requirements about meaningful consultation are satisfied. It is perhaps dubious whether this complies with European law and the process is conditional on both employers agreeing. According to BIS, ‘it is unclear how many businesses will decide to use this measure’.”

McMullen says an “awkward” point in the 2006 Regulations regarding transfers involving a change of location or workplace has now been settled, meaning such changes could no longer trigger automatic unfair dismissal claims.

He added: “In some ways the Regulations are more important for what they do not do than what they do.  

“For example, apart from one small amendment the service provision change rules have been retained and the transferor’s obligation to give the transferee employee liability information has also been retained, and strengthened.  

“Of interest to employers will be the simplification of the rules relating to permitted variations of employment contracts and dismissals because of a transfer. Variations will no longer be invalid and dismissals only automatically unfair if the sole or principal reason for the variation or dismissal is the transfer.” 

McMullen says it will also now “be possible to renegotiate terms derived from collective agreements after one year and provided that employees are no worse off”.

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll