header-logo header-logo

18 December 2015 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

The new wave (Pt 2)

LIBOR manipulation & disclosure: Simon Duncan continues his review of recent banking litigation in the wake of swap mis-selling

The judgment of Mr Justice Birss was handed down after the latest interim hearing in Property Alliance Group Limited v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [2015] EWHC 3272 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 159 (Nov) on 13 November 2015.

Property Alliance Group Limited (PAG) is a property developer. PAG entered into four interest rate swaps with the defendant bank (RBS) between October 2004 and April 2008. Each swap used GBP LIBOR as a reference rate. PAG terminated the swaps in June 2011 at a break cost of £8m to stem their ongoing losses. PAG issued its claim in September 2013, seeking to recover the break cost and a further £5m paid under the swaps.

Following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Graiseley v Barclays Bank and Others [2013] EWCA Civ 1372, [2013] All ER (D) 100 (Nov). PAG pleaded that RBS made four representations about LIBOR. In summary:

  • that
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll