header-logo header-logo

17 March 2023 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Company
printer mail-detail

Next steps when joint ventures fall apart

Rakesh Kapila considers the common causes of dispute in ill-fated joint business ventures—and how a forensic accountant can help
  • The common disputes which can arise in relation to a joint venture.
  • How a forensic accountant can help to clarify financial issues in dispute.

Joint business ventures are common between parties who combine resources to carry out a specific activity. It is important, however, for the parties in a joint venture to be clear as to what they wish to derive from it and for the rights and responsibilities of the participants to be expressed as clearly as possible.

Joint venture disputes

Disputes may arise in situations in which, for example:

  • there is no written information, such as a joint venture agreement, on how the joint venture is to be managed and on the roles of the parties;
  • there are no financial/accounting provisions in the joint venture agreement or they are not sufficiently clear or specific;
  • there is no clarity around the area of financing, including
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll