header-logo header-logo

Next steps when joint ventures fall apart

17 March 2023 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Company
printer mail-detail
Rakesh Kapila considers the common causes of dispute in ill-fated joint business ventures—and how a forensic accountant can help
  • The common disputes which can arise in relation to a joint venture.
  • How a forensic accountant can help to clarify financial issues in dispute.

Joint business ventures are common between parties who combine resources to carry out a specific activity. It is important, however, for the parties in a joint venture to be clear as to what they wish to derive from it and for the rights and responsibilities of the participants to be expressed as clearly as possible.

Joint venture disputes

Disputes may arise in situations in which, for example:

  • there is no written information, such as a joint venture agreement, on how the joint venture is to be managed and on the roles of the parties;
  • there are no financial/accounting provisions in the joint venture agreement or they are not sufficiently clear or specific;
  • there is no clarity around the area of financing, including
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll