13 May 2022

Issue: 7978 / Categories: Features

printer

mail-detail

NFTs as property: what next?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

81434

Non-fungible tokens have been confirmed as property by the High Court: Racheal Muldoon of 36 Commercial and counsel for the successful applicant hails the ruling & explores its implications for NFTs going forward

In March, the High Court recognised for the first time that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) constitute property and are therefore capable of being the subject of an injunction.
There are many implications of this landmark ruling, including that it empowers NFT holders to seek recourse from the courts where NFTs have been unlawfully removed, and suggests that NFTs are taxable and can be held on trust etc.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are often ridiculed as valueless digital images of apes, capable of being downloaded by anyone at the click of a mouse. The unprecedented acceleration in the demand for NFTs in 2021, as captured in the recently published The Art Market 2022 Report by Art Basel and UBS, is equally disregarded as a short-lived ‘fad’. But what of these criticisms if NFTs constituted legal property?

On 10 March of this year, Pelling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

NFTs as property: what next?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

81434

Non-fungible tokens have been confirmed as property by the High Court: Racheal Muldoon of 36 Commercial and counsel for the successful applicant hails the ruling & explores its implications for NFTs going forward

In March, the High Court recognised for the first time that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) constitute property and are therefore capable of being the subject of an injunction.
There are many implications of this landmark ruling, including that it empowers NFT holders to seek recourse from the courts where NFTs have been unlawfully removed, and suggests that NFTs are taxable and can be held on trust etc.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are often ridiculed as valueless digital images of apes, capable of being downloaded by anyone at the click of a mouse. The unprecedented acceleration in the demand for NFTs in 2021, as captured in the recently published The Art Market 2022 Report by Art Basel and UBS, is equally disregarded as a short-lived ‘fad’. But what of these criticisms if NFTs constituted legal property?

On 10 March of this year, Pelling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

NLJ this week: Do Mandelson and Mountbatten-Windsor meet the misconduct bar?

Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle

NLJ this week: Supreme Court unlocks ‘lost years’ windfall for injured children

A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings

NLJ this week: Finality trumps freedom in arbitration showdown

A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996

back-to-top-scroll