header-logo header-logo

10 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Nicklinson continues

Widow of "locked-in" sufferer is granted leave to appeal

Tony Nicklinson’s widow has been granted leave to appeal his case that the law was incompatible with his Art 8 rights to a private life. Jane Nicklinson will continue her late husband’s challenge to the law on murder and assisted suicide, as the administrator of his estate, and has been granted a protective costs order.

Mr Nicklinson suffered ‘locked-in’ syndrome, and sought a court declaration that it was legal for a doctor to help him end his life, and to argue an Art 8 infringement. However, the High Court dismissed his case in August, before his death. He died of pneumonia a week later after refusing medical treatment and food.

Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll