header-logo header-logo

29 September 2016 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

A Nightmare on Claimant Street

Fixed costs are unfair and unjust to claimants, says Patrick Allen

Fixed costs for claims up to £250,000 will cause substantial disadvantage to individuals who bring claims and bring an undeserved windfall to insurers and corporate defendants.

The backers of fixed costs (including Lord Justice Jackson, the government and insurers) suggest that they will bring certainty to the system to make it proportionate and predictable.

But it is not so simple. Litigation is not a fair fight between equally resourced players but a war between two very unequal parties.

Statistics confirm that most claimants are individual citizens of modest means (the median gross earnings for all employees in 2014 was £22,044, pensioners, children and the disabled, who will also be claimants, earned much less) and the defendant is usually local or central government, the police, a large corporate body or an insured person. As a consequence, most defendants have the backing of considerable wealth and resources.

This is shown by the fact

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll