header-logo header-logo

Nip it in the bud

12 December 2014 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , ADR
printer mail-detail

Dispute resolution is dead, long live dispute avoidance, says Martin Burns

More and more government and industry bodies are seeking to reduce legal costs associated with resolving disputes by using a range of early intervention techniques. These are designed to help contracting parties avoid disputes by managing commercial relationships through difficult situations, and preventing minor issues escalating into full blown disputes.

Early intervention

Arbitration, adjudication, and other traditional forms of dispute resolution are usually employed only after legal costs have been racked up, commercial relationships have been damaged and party positions have become entrenched. Early intervention techniques, on the other hand, can help to manage conflicts and nip disputes in the bud. This can mean the difference between good business driven by good business relationships, and no business at all.

The reality to commercial relationships is that conflict is always possible. Early intervention addresses this by involving contracting parties in establishing, at an early stage, how their disagreements will be handled. The objective is to focus minds on how potential problems will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll