header-logo header-logo

NLJ Career Profile: James Bremen, Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen

21 July 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
James Bremen, recently appointed presiding partner of Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen, shares his admiration for the judiciary & his ideas for closing skills gaps left by the pandemic

What was your route into the profession?

I attended law school in Australia in the 1990s, two-year articles at a large Brisbane firm (McCullough Robertson) and, following a further two years as a solicitor, I was recruited to join White and Case in London in 2002. I requalified in England and Wales shortly thereafter and subsequently gained Higher Rights (Civil and Crime).

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Building a global disputes practice that is sustainable and based on long-term relationships, successful outcomes and personal trust. This often leaves you extremely time-poor, and jet-lagged. There have definitely been long periods of my career where I have had little work-life balance, although for the most part I have very much enjoyed the journey and still do.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Rather than a specific individual, I will say members of the senior judiciary. I say that because leading silks walk away from earning vast incomes at the independent Bar to join the court, which is often under-resourced, underpaid and isolated. They are subject to great scrutiny and sometimes undeserved criticism from the media, government and public. They make this sacrifice because having a robust, independent and fair judiciary is vastly more important to our society than most people realize.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I have very few talents so my choices are limited—perhaps an academic or writer.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Kate Sullivan, the corporate lawyer in the 1991 film Other People’s Money. The film wouldn’t be made today, and the characters are larger than life, but not so far from reality at that time. I like the dialogue:

‘Kate: Why so uptight? It’s not illegal.

Garfield: It’s immoral. A distinction with no relevance to lawyers. But it matters to me.’

What change would you make to the profession?

For the first four years’ post-qualification, I would make it a regulatory requirement that associates have to sit with a senior associate or partner in the same room for at least four days a week. The public are entitled to expect that solicitors at four years’ PQE or above be able to have the full carriage of matters—which is very rare now. The supervisor should be required to sign off on the associate that they are functioning at the standard of a solicitor, and provide the solicitor with adequate work and supervision so that they are developed to that standard.

Working from home has meant that there has been a hollowing-out of skills of junior and mid-level solicitors. This was done for me, and I did it for others. It was not credited or billed time—it was simply part of the job. Please direct all hate mail to NLJ.

How do you relax?

Reading a good book on a remote island with no Wi-Fi or email reception. Playing chess. Country walks with my family and our labrador. Also of course wine, but that goes without saying.


James Bremen is presiding partner of Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen and head of the construction litigation and arbitration practice.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll