header-logo header-logo

NLJ career profile: Satnam Tumani

07 May 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Now a partner at Edmonds Marshall McMahon, Satnam Tumani has more than 30 years’ experience in fraud and corruption prosecutions, including 18 years at the Serious Fraud Office. He talks to NLJ about some particularly challenging cases, and his long-term 'unrealistic' plan to head for the mountains

What was your route into the profession?

I was an undergraduate at Brunel University, which operated a four-year ‘sandwich’ LLB. Unfortunately, my qualification coincided with a severe recession. Like many other law undergraduates, I found it impossible to secure a training contract. I took on a waiting job at a café bar in Tobacco Dock, Wapping. It was adjacent to News International and I found myself waiting on editors and senior journalists for over a year. Eventually, I saw an opportunity to be a short-term paralegal at the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). I started on a one-week contract to help a team that was supporting the SFO’s defence, in the Court of Appeal, of the convictions in the Guinness case. My contract was extended on a weekly then monthly basis, before I was finally made permanent.

Together with a friend (Karl Banister), we persuaded the then director of the SFO to make us the first two in-house SFO trainees. After qualification, I spent a year as a closely supervised junior lawyer at the SFO, followed by roles as an investigating lawyer, a case controller and then as an assistant director.

One of the great ironies of my SFO career was that I ended up becoming the case controller for the final appeals to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of the Guinness defendants, a full circle if ever there was one. In case you are wondering, Karl went on to great things, becoming a senior civil servant in the Government Legal Service at a young age. He is now director of operations, legal and clinical and deputy ombudsman at the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

One of my earliest cases involved a fraud against more than 18,000 low-income victims. The investigating police force and I found it an incredibly challenging case. While the overall quantum of financial loss was relatively low, the impact on those low-income victims was high. The sheer numbers of victims inevitably led to presentation by spreadsheet in many aspects of the case. At the risk of being impertinent, my impression was that the relatively simply factual matrix did not set the pulse racing from the perspective of the judiciary, which resulted in drift and delay. The response of the system to restraint and confiscation, and the defendants’ flouting of deadlines, was conservative to such an extent that we faced an uphill task in securing financial redress for the victims. The remoteness of the loss seemed to encourage a systemic ‘this case can wait’ attitude in many segments of the criminal justice system. The police and I fought that lethargy and tried our best to repeatedly push the case and the public interest.

The challenge in keeping motivated in these circumstances is huge and I am sure that in many cases, prosecutors simply become resigned to cases disappearing into the ether. This leads to the risk of disillusionment at every level. In the end, victims can’t get meaningful answers from victim support officers, and they too become detached from a system that should support them every bit as much as it should support those accused of crime.

I’d like to think times have changed but, if anything, the dynamic has steadily got worse. There are increasing numbers of ‘orphan cases’, ie, cases that no one will take carriage of. If it were not for private prosecution, many of these cases would be left to wither entirely.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

One of my great legal inspirations, Tony Shaw KC, has recently announced his retirement and so he seems a fitting candidate to talk about now. One of my early roles at the SFO involved me going to the Court of Appeal in 1995 to note the hearing of an appeal against conviction by a certain Mr Rozeik [1995] EWCA Crim J1006-6. Tony had taken over the conduct of the appeal at the last minute and together amd managed to persuade the court that the Crown and the trial judge had erred in understanding the circumstances in which a company could be deceived (where there was some evidence of complicity in the alleged crime from within the ranks of the company).

I (and indeed the court, given what they say about Tony in the judgment) was deeply impressed by the way in which Tony put the case, in particular given the paucity of time in which he had to prepare. Not long after Roziek, I encountered Tony again during the Butte Mining trial, one of the longest criminal trials in UK history. I played a minor part in that case but it meant my attendance at court, almost every day for over six months. I got to know Tony pretty well and when the chance finally came some years later, I managed to persuade him to prosecute a case for the SFO. Since then, he and I have worked on many other cases, both throughout my SFO career and also during my tenure at Kirkland.

Tony is incredibly clever, hard working and imaginative; he uses every conceivable computer aid to maximum effect; he is personable, a good team player and most importantly, he is respectful of everyone and their role. He treats the most junior staff member with the same level of respect he would afford a senior prosecutor or partner at a law firm.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

From an early stage, I was determined to be a lawyer. The only other career I have ever wanted, in a totally unrealistic manner, was to be a ski instructor. Before my children were born, my wife and I would ski almost 30 days a year. Life in all of its many facets has caused an inevitable regression in the standard of my skiing. When I finally do retire, I will, knees permitting, commit to passing the relevant qualifications. In many Alpine resorts, part-time qualified skiers are used to support established ski schools during the peak holiday weeks. I had a fascinating ski lesson from a retired Italian architect last year. Maybe I’ll scratch the itch one day.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Tommy Mullaney from LA Law. For a period of time it was compulsive viewing.

How do you relax?

In the company of my wife and children. I ski at every chance I get. I love a road trip and love the process of planning one. I am also a keen photographer. Lastly, good food and wine, or a Negroni with friends and/or family.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll