header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The NLJ column

Why do we allow revenge and neglect to play such major roles in our justice systems?

There can be no more emotive a crime than the murder of a child by its mother. Such a notion must strike at the very foundations of society.
The essence of society’s condemnation of murder, and the strict approach taken by the law to its commission is that it is the murderer’s explicit intention that the victim should die, or at least suffer really serious harm. The consequent sentence of mandatory life imprisonment follows on from this basic principle; it is driven, not so much by legal logic, but by the public demand for retribution.

A different kind of murder?

All this is well and good when one is dealing with the heinous actions of cold-blooded murder, born of anger, revenge or pure evil. But in almost all the cases of mothers killing their children, none of these reprehensible criteria exists. It is time to recognise that these mothers are probably not murderers and should not face the mandatory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll