header-logo header-logo

12 July 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

It’s time to recognise the benefits of restorative justice

Until recently, restorative justice has been on the fringes of penal reform. However, some eminent support has recently been given for the principle. Most notably, the Archbishop of Canterbury spoke at a recent lecture organised by the Prison Reform Trust, supporting the introduction of restorative justice into the mainstream of sentencing policy.

The main thrust of the restorative justice approach is that victim can confront offender. This is considered primarily to benefit the victims of crime by enabling them to meet, and to some extent demystify, the perpetrators of crime. It has also been considered to be of assistance to the offender, who is also confronted with the consequence of their actions.

One of the main criticisms of the restorative justice regime has been that the victim has had little control or influence over its process. Furthermore, and significantly, it has been perceived to be a soft option.
These issues have recently been addressed, particularly as a result of the government’s “victim led” approach to criminal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll