header-logo header-logo

12 July 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

It’s time to recognise the benefits of restorative justice

Until recently, restorative justice has been on the fringes of penal reform. However, some eminent support has recently been given for the principle. Most notably, the Archbishop of Canterbury spoke at a recent lecture organised by the Prison Reform Trust, supporting the introduction of restorative justice into the mainstream of sentencing policy.

The main thrust of the restorative justice approach is that victim can confront offender. This is considered primarily to benefit the victims of crime by enabling them to meet, and to some extent demystify, the perpetrators of crime. It has also been considered to be of assistance to the offender, who is also confronted with the consequence of their actions.

One of the main criticisms of the restorative justice regime has been that the victim has had little control or influence over its process. Furthermore, and significantly, it has been perceived to be a soft option.
These issues have recently been addressed, particularly as a result of the government’s “victim led” approach to criminal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll