header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

Taxing times as Law Lords consider Jones v Garnett

The Law Lords could deliver judgment before the end of July in the Arctic Systems case—Jones v Garnett—which could affect up to 340,000 small businesses.

The case concerns whether dividends paid by a company, Arctic Systems Ltd, to a working shareholder, Mrs Jones, consisted of income arising under a settlement as defined by s 660a(1) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (TA 1988) and so should be treated as the income of the company’s director and her husband, Mr Jones.

The couple set up a small IT company where Mr Jones was the sole director, and both spouses paid £1 for one share each in the company. Both took low salaries and received the balance of the company’s profits by dividend, which was split equally between them and which saved them tax. HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) successfully argued in the High Court that the dividends going to Mrs Jones could be reallocated under settlements legislation to Mr Jones and extra

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll