header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

Taxing times as Law Lords consider Jones v Garnett

The Law Lords could deliver judgment before the end of July in the Arctic Systems case—Jones v Garnett—which could affect up to 340,000 small businesses.

The case concerns whether dividends paid by a company, Arctic Systems Ltd, to a working shareholder, Mrs Jones, consisted of income arising under a settlement as defined by s 660a(1) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (TA 1988) and so should be treated as the income of the company’s director and her husband, Mr Jones.

The couple set up a small IT company where Mr Jones was the sole director, and both spouses paid £1 for one share each in the company. Both took low salaries and received the balance of the company’s profits by dividend, which was split equally between them and which saved them tax. HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) successfully argued in the High Court that the dividends going to Mrs Jones could be reallocated under settlements legislation to Mr Jones and extra

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll