header-logo header-logo

19 November 2020
Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Tax
printer mail-detail

Advertorial: How to tell if you’ve paid too much stamp duty

Property buyers may be overpaying millions of pounds of stamp duty land tax (SDLT) each year, tax specialists Cornerstone has warned

Writing in NLJ this week (attached as a pdf below) Cornerstone’s David Hannah says: ‘Our estimate, based on internal research, is that as many as one in five SDLT returns may be being incorrectly completed on property purchases.’

But how do you tell if you’ve paid (or might be asked to pay) too much stamp duty? There is no easy answer and ‘no one-size-fits-all equation’, says Hannah.

Hannah outlines some reasons why solicitors make mistakes when calculating SDLT.

@Cornerstone_Tax

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll