header-logo header-logo

27 November 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ Profile: Dr Nicholas Bevan

The multiple award-winning solicitor and partner discusses being inspired by Lord Bingham and Gina Miller, an artistic temperament, and a love for good food and lots of wine.

What was your route into the profession?

I began my legal career as an assistant barrister’s clerk at what was then Lord Hailsham’s chambers, in the Inner Temple.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Between 2015 and 2018 I was behind RoadPeace’s judicial review of the government’s defective implementation of the European Motor Insurance Directives. It was a huge undertaking based on my research that exposed over 80 separate infringements of EU law that unjustly denied motor accident victims their proper compensatory entitlement. My research into Direct Effect was applied in Lewis v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2019] EWCA Civ 909 to good effect.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Lord Bingham, for his evocation of the rule of law. After him, Gina Miller for seeking to preserve it.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I blame my inherently disorganised frame of mind on an artistic temperament. So I find the notion of losing myself for hours working on some grand composition rather appealing, even if the results would almost inevitably prove to be a disappointment.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Rumpole of the Bailey, for reasons no lawyer need explain.

What change would you make to the profession?

To restore the political independence of the office of the Lord Chancellor.

How do you relax?

I love spending time with my two daughters and my wider family, hill walking, photography, history (of almost any epoch), listening to classical music and opera, good food and lots of wine.

Dr Nicholas Bevan is a multiple award-winning solicitor and partner at both Solicitors Title LLP and Broomhead & Saul solicitors. He is a nationally recognised presenter and a successful law reform campaigner. In 2017 he was awarded a doctorate in law for his ground-breaking research on EU and insurance law. He was senior counsel at an international law firm. He persuaded the government to pass emergency legislation sanctioning the video witnessing of wills in 2020 after executing the nation’s first video will during the COVID-19 lockdown.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll