header-logo header-logo

NLJ PROFILE: Melanie Willems, Haynes and Boone

03 July 2018
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
melanie_willems_hi_head_0

Haynes and Boone's new head of international arbitration shares her unconventional career beginnings with NLJ

What was your route into the profession?

It was perhaps not the most conventional one. I trained as an opera singer and did a year of musicology at the Sorbonne in Paris before getting cold feet about that career. I then applied to do a prestigious law course: the Anglo-French Double Maîtrise, run by King’s College in London and the Sorbonne in Paris. I was lucky to win a place on this four-year course, which led to me gaining an LLB as well as a Maîtrise (so a French law degree and an English law degree). After that, being a glutton for punishment, I did a part-time MSc in construction law and arbitration, while I was working as a newly-qualified lawyer.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

While still a relatively junior partner, I left a large English law firm to set up my own international arbitration team. Many industry colleagues kindly took the time to warn me about the risk of failure inherent in such a bold step. Whether by luck or by design (and perhaps a bit of both), we have thrived. I think it’s because we care deeply about our clients and treat them as we would wish to be treated ourselves by professionals.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

I was trained by Chris Vigrass, recently retired from Ashurst, who could say more with a raised eyebrow than many can with a speech. I have also benefitted from quiet support from both John Uff QC, who tutored me on the MSc course, and Gary Born. I am also grateful to colleagues in the remarkably collegiate international arbitration industry, who have encouraged me along the way. More academically, Lord Bingham remains a guiding light—his book on the rule of law should be compulsory reading in schools.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

Writing. I love words, and I love communication.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Judge Dredd.

What change would you make to the profession?

I want to contribute to improving diversity. It goes without saying, doesn’t it?

How do you relax?

Discussions with trusted friends on everything from food to politics.There is certainly enough that warrants being debated at length these days.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll