header-logo header-logo

04 October 2019
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Noor Kadhim, Gardner Leader

Noor Kadhim, partner & international arbitration expert at Gardner Leader, discusses the changes she'd make to the profession: less paper, more pragmatism

What was your route into the profession?

I joined a top ten international firm based in London after completing an undergraduate honours and French language degree at Glasgow University, and then a postgraduate qualification at Oxford. International arbitration was always a field of interest given my multicultural background and interest and experience in both the civil and common law, so I took the first opportunity to join a magic circle practice in an Arabic-speaking country abroad after qualification, and worked for a short time in France at a large arbitration institution before moving back to London in 2016. I have never looked back.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Trying to find funding for a large international treaty arbitration in which the quantum of investment is low. The project is new and un-started, and the respondent State is a maverick sub–Saharan African state with a history of non-compliance with treaty awards! We are still trying as I will not give up easily.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

David Phillips QC at Wilberforce Chambers, because he manages to retain a distinctive flamboyance in his attire amongst a sea of grey boring suits. And because he possesses a flair, lucidity and charisma that crosses over seamlessly into his oral advocacy such that he can defuse the resistant attitude of even the grumpiest and seemingly impervious of judges.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

A consigliere in lifestyle and the arts.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Atticus Finch, from To Kill A Mockingbird.

What change would you make to the profession?

Less paper and more pragmatism.

How do you relax?

Writing responses to legal journal questionnaires. Failing which, swimming in the Mediterranean Sea.

Noor Kadhim, partner and international arbitration expert in Gardner Leader’s dispute resolution team.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll