header-logo header-logo

17 February 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

NLJ Profile: Ravi Nayer

The new partner in Brown Rudnick’s litigation & arbitration practice in London discusses a difficult start, Manchester City FC & Judge John Deed

What was your route into the profession?


My route into the profession started with some difficulty. Given terrible predicted A-level grades, I was fortunate to get into a good Russell Group university and soon found that I loved the freedom to write history essays (mostly on seventeenth century British history!). I converted to law at BPP in London and with the benefit of scholarships and lodgings from Lincoln's Inn, undertook the BVC and pupillage. After a couple of years, and following a stint as a judicial assistant in the Court of Appeal while teaching part time, I realised the self-employed Bar was not for me at that time in my life and I moved over to the other side of the profession, learning the skills I would need bit by bit. Having found patient and understanding mentors, I didn't look back and found the space and time (including a sabbatical at Oxford) to develop my interests in multi-party claims, compensation schemes and, what we might call, a purposeful approach to litigation.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

I think every case has its own challenges, although the novel ones where you start with a blank sheet of paper, such as the RBS Rights’ Issue Litigation or compensation scheme for Manchester City FC, have provided unique challenges. Beyond cases, I actually think the greatest challenge (and reward) is to try to be true to who you are. For me, that means I try to be honest, hard working and optimistic and to make sure I can bring that to bear for the benefit of our clients.

Which person or persons within the legal profession inspires you most?

I am inspired by colleagues and friends who work hard for their clients and take the time to foster the next generation. My first mentor, Richard Slaven, now at Clyde & Co, taught me far more than he ever intended by his instinctive approach to litigation; the clients who trusted me to learn on the job, most of all Geoffrey Timms, Group General Counsel of Legal & General Plc; and my friend, Debo Nwauzu and others like her, who have led the way and devoted so much of their time to their legal careers—with all of its privileges—they are a real inspiration to non-traditional entrants.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I admire creativity in others, and try to give it an outlet in my own life. To that end, I think I would choose something creative but where there is some social purpose, like architecture, which I think has a wonderful power to impact lives. 

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Oddly, I have never watched or read much involving fictional lawyers, only because I didn't want to get disappointed by the comparative lack of glamour in my own life! It would probably be ‘Judge John Deed’ for his ability to simultaneously be part of the establishment while having lost none of his radicalism to affect people’s lives.

What change would you make to the profession?

As part of the desire for a level playing field, where careers and success are much more closely correlated to a person’s hard work and aptitude, there is a subtle change that we can all make. As the child of immigrants, I was taught that there was no room for mistakes and that I had to work the proverbial ‘110%’ in order to succeed as a non-traditional entrant to a profession that can, sometimes, feel like a closed shop. We each process this pressure when we are young differently, and undoubtedly the pressure has a bigger impact on some rather than others. As leaders in our firms, I feel we have a responsibility to be cognisant of this stress and its impact on those who aspire to the profession but who doubt themselves and we need to take active steps to inspire while giving them the licence to be imperfect and to make mistakes.

How do you relax?

At work and outside, I really enjoy listening to music. Whether classical or discovering new neo-soul artists, I never go a day without listening to music. Aside from that, and avoiding the long-forgotten gym membership, I've recently got into gardening in a big way and am trying to learn the basics. So I would say…music and gardening!  

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll