header-logo header-logo

31 January 2018
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Stephen Parkinson, Kingsley Napley

stephen_parkinson_img_1238_edited

Stephen Parkinson is a highly experienced criminal and public lawyer, and on 1 May will become Kingsley Napley's new senior partner.

What was your route into the profession?

Competition with my brother.  He was the first ever person in our family to win a place at university to study law and his success caused me to look at law as a career for the first time. Then, having achieved better-than-expected A Levels, I decided not to take up my place to read humanities at Thames Polytechnic, took a year out and gained a place to study law at UCL. After university, I started at the Bar, but moved quite quickly into the Government Legal Service where I worked in a number of departments before joining Kingsley Napley in 2002 and re-qualifying as a solicitor.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Representing Tony Blair, and superintending the preparation of all the No.10 and Cabinet Office witnesses during the Hutton Inquiry, which was established following the suicide of David Kelly. Controversy over the Iraq War was at its height at that time and there was enormous public interest in the inquiry.  To advise a serving Prime Minister and key figures in the government on giving evidence was a major challenge.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Sir David Napley.  He was such a brilliant lawyer because his perspective was so broad and his experience so wide-ranging which, in turn, meant that his judgment was impeccable. We don’t make lawyers like him anymore, because we have become so specialised.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I would have been a supermarket manager.  In fact, I tried to join Sainsbury’s in 1974 but was turned down because I was too academic.  It is a pity that my interviewers did not check with my teachers on this point: they would have received a wholly different perspective. 

What change would you make to the profession?

I don’t think it is for me, given my age, colour and gender, to lecture the profession on diversity, but if I can make a difference at Kingsley Napley in my new role then great. I  want us to attract a richer and more varied mix of talent into our firm, and to give people from non-traditional backgrounds the confidence to apply to us.

How do you relax?

I started running a couple of years ago  and find it really enjoyable, but I do need a race to motivate me to train hard.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll