header-logo header-logo

01 April 2019
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Zoe O'Sullivan QC

Barrister Zoe O'Sullivan QC, who recently joined Serle Court Chambers, tells NLJ where her love of words has taken her

What was your route into the profession?

I read English at Oxford University. Having decided that I would enjoy a career involving words, I initially flirted with becoming a solicitor before deciding to apply for the law conversion course at City University. After City, I completed my Bar finals and moved straight on to pupillage and tenancy at One Essex Court, where I remained until my move to Serle Court Chambers in March 2019.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

On returning to work after having my third child, I was instructed as part of the counsel team in a huge IT case, BSkyB Ltd and another v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd (formerly Electronic Data Systems Ltd) and others [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC), which occupied a whole year of court time in the Technology and Construction Court. I had to work most weekends and holidays while caring for three very small children (with the help of my long-suffering husband).  However, I did develop my experience into a successful IT practice.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

I am simply in awe of Dinah Rose QC of Blackstone Chambers, who seems to be incapable of losing a case.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

Senior management at John Lewis, my favourite shop.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Chuck Rhoades Jr in the TV series Billions.

What change would you make to the profession?

I would move away from billing by the hour, which encourages inefficiency and makes young lawyers miserable.

How do you relax?

I sing with the Bach Choir, and dance the Argentine tango badly.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll