header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Banks, lenders & the doctrine of purview

06 September 2024
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Banking
printer mail-detail
188090
It’s a little-used & somewhat opaque doctrine with significant potential when used as a defence

In this week’s NLJ, Jonathan Bennett, associate at Brecher, and James Davies, New Square Chambers, discuss the doctrine of purview in the law of guarantees, which ‘can have an effect on enforcement attempts against debtors (principally any guarantors) under a mortgage’ and is therefore a doctrine that banks, lenders and their advisors should consider.

Bennett and Davies look at the doctrine’s origins and consider recent case law, including a case in which the authors acted for the successful petitioner on a bankruptcy petition where the purview doctrine was deployed by the debtor as a defence to the petition debt.

The authors helpfully provide a list of tips for lenders to consider. For example, they write: ‘It should be noted that “all monies” guarantees will be far less susceptible to challenge on the basis of the purview doctrine.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll