header-logo header-logo

06 September 2024
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Banking
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Banks, lenders & the doctrine of purview

188090
It’s a little-used & somewhat opaque doctrine with significant potential when used as a defence

In this week’s NLJ, Jonathan Bennett, associate at Brecher, and James Davies, New Square Chambers, discuss the doctrine of purview in the law of guarantees, which ‘can have an effect on enforcement attempts against debtors (principally any guarantors) under a mortgage’ and is therefore a doctrine that banks, lenders and their advisors should consider.

Bennett and Davies look at the doctrine’s origins and consider recent case law, including a case in which the authors acted for the successful petitioner on a bankruptcy petition where the purview doctrine was deployed by the debtor as a defence to the petition debt.

The authors helpfully provide a list of tips for lenders to consider. For example, they write: ‘It should be noted that “all monies” guarantees will be far less susceptible to challenge on the basis of the purview doctrine.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll