header-logo header-logo

18 October 2024
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , In Court , Litigation funding , Court of Protection
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Costs judges & the ‘dreadful’ drag of delays

193155

Lies cost, as The insider, aka Professor Dominic Regan, reports in this week’s column

Regan, of City Law School, relays news of a rise in fundamental dishonesty pleadings, with devastating results for some less-than-truthful claimants.

Regan offers useful tips for readers on the latest literature to follow up on, including useful guidance from LeO, and a teaser for a future column!

He also discusses the important role of the senior costs judge—who is due to retire at the end of this month with his replacement still to be chosen—suggesting whoever does take over address the ‘dreadful’ delay in assessing bills of costs at the Court of Protection. Regan writes: ‘Apart from the frustration of slow payment for work done long ago, the delay can hinder the finalising of an estate where a protected party has died.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll