header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Court backs Tower Hamlets database in discrimination claim

03 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Discrimination , Local authority , Equality
printer mail-detail
231389
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database

The system, designed to allocate scarce housing efficiently, was attacked by Anisa Begum, a single mother who argued it placed women at a particular disadvantage, relying on statistical evidence. Shelter intervened in support.

Both the High Court and Court of Appeal disagreed, finding the database was not a ‘deferral list’ and did not itself cause disadvantage: men and women in unsuitable accommodation were ‘in the same boat’. Lord Justice Lewis stressed that causation, not correlation, was key, and that the real issue was shortage of supply, not database design.

The judgment is likely to attract attention from other housing authorities as a lawful model for managing acute demand under equality law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll