header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Discrimination , Local authority , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Court backs Tower Hamlets database in discrimination claim

231389
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database

The system, designed to allocate scarce housing efficiently, was attacked by Anisa Begum, a single mother who argued it placed women at a particular disadvantage, relying on statistical evidence. Shelter intervened in support.

Both the High Court and Court of Appeal disagreed, finding the database was not a ‘deferral list’ and did not itself cause disadvantage: men and women in unsuitable accommodation were ‘in the same boat’. Lord Justice Lewis stressed that causation, not correlation, was key, and that the real issue was shortage of supply, not database design.

The judgment is likely to attract attention from other housing authorities as a lawful model for managing acute demand under equality law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll