header-logo header-logo

08 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Crypto , Cybercrime , Fraud , Technology , International , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Crypto freeze, British shrug?

249007
© Getty images
A pioneering cryptoasset recovery case has exposed an arguable failure by UK law enforcement to use powers already available under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Writing in NLJ this week, Ashley Fairbrother and Rhys Evans of Edmonds Marshall McMahon recount how their client, a US citizen duped in a devastating romance fraud, lost nearly $1m after being manipulated by a fake ‘Kensington-based diplomat’

Blockchain investigators traced around $800,000 in USDT to Tether-controlled wallets, but despite repeated requests, five UK agencies declined to act. Instead, a Californian police officer and the US IRS Criminal Investigations Division secured seizure warrants and ultimately recovered the funds.

The article champions Tether’s ‘burn-and-remint’ mechanism as ‘a standard tool of modern asset recovery’, and warns that British victims are being left to watch ‘their stolen pensions sit immobile on the blockchain’ while overseas authorities intervene.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll