header-logo header-logo

04 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Double offering on costs—fixed costs in intermediate track & discontinued claims

191456

Costs are an essential part of litigation but can be baffling for lawyers. Help is at hand in this week’s NLJ, with no less than two articles on this hugely important topic

First up, John O’Hare, a retired costs judge, offers advice on calculating what’s recoverable in fixed costs in intermediate track cases. O’Hare looks in detail at Practice Direction 45, Table 14, through which the amount payable to the winner is dependent on five calculations.

Next, Claudine Morgan, legal director, and Mary Barrett, associate, at Charles Russell Speechlys, discuss why defendants should not presume their costs will be met when claims are discontinued. While the general rule is that the defendant should not bear the burden of costs for a claim deemed not worth pursuing, the court may decide otherwise. But when, why, and under what circumstances? The authors explain.

Morgan and Barrett conclude with some sterling advice: ‘If an application is made, the dirty laundry of pre-action correspondence will inevitably be aired and parties should be prepared for criticism on conduct. An aggressive approach or tone can look very different with hindsight.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll