header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: EAT rulings redraw key employment law boundaries

254472
© Getty images
Four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have clarified important employment law principles on dismissal, bonuses, trade union activity and tribunal procedure

Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at the University of East Anglia, highlights a ruling confirming that an employee's motives may, in some cases, help determine whether conduct amounts to repudiatory breach, observing that 'motive may, in an appropriate case, be evidence as to how a reasonable person would react'.

He also examines a bonus dispute where an employer could no longer 'move the goalposts' after entitlement had crystallised, together with decisions on the limits of the separability defence in trade union dismissals and extensions of time for tribunal responses.

Collectively, the judgments reinforce a fact-sensitive approach while placing limits on employer discretion. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll