header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: EAT rulings redraw key employment law boundaries

254472
© Getty images
Four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have clarified important employment law principles on dismissal, bonuses, trade union activity and tribunal procedure

Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at the University of East Anglia, highlights a ruling confirming that an employee's motives may, in some cases, help determine whether conduct amounts to repudiatory breach, observing that 'motive may, in an appropriate case, be evidence as to how a reasonable person would react'.

He also examines a bonus dispute where an employer could no longer 'move the goalposts' after entitlement had crystallised, together with decisions on the limits of the separability defence in trade union dismissals and extensions of time for tribunal responses.

Collectively, the judgments reinforce a fact-sensitive approach while placing limits on employer discretion. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll